In the 1790's in Virginia, the children of female slaves were slaves and the children of freed female slaves were free. It was not easy for an enslaved woman to achieve freedom, but if she did, she freed all her unborn future generations as well. Sally Hemings at 16 was presented with this opportunity, and Annette Gordon-Reed spends a long time trying to figure out the motivation behind her decision.
Hemings was 16, living in Paris with U.S. ambassador Jefferson and pregnant with his child when it was time to go home. Gordon-Reed painstakingly (emphasis on the pain, for the reader) explains how easy it would have been for Hemings to gain her legal freedom in Paris, which did not permit slavery. She also makes it perfectly clear that Jefferson didn't force Hemings to return with him to Virginia; he talked her into it, and struck a bargain. The agreement was that he would free all her children with him when they turned 21. But as Gordon-Reed points out, she could have become free in Paris immediately if she stayed, and her unborn child and all subsequent children she had in her lifetime would be, therefore, also free. So why did she go back to Virginia?
Gordon-Reed runs through a number of options, but none is the clear answer.
- She could have loved Jefferson, but then why the hard bargaining? Besides, it doesn't seem likely that a beautiful (Gordon-Reed gives evidence of this) 16-year-old girl is going to fall in love with a 46-year-old man. (Sorry, 46-year-old men.)
- She could have missed her family. But she'd been separated from them for eight years already, and surely there would be some way to reunite with them eventually. And remember we're talking slave/free here. High stakes.
- She could have been outsmarted by Jefferson. But again, the length and seriousness of the bargain, which resulted in a written document, does not support this. and Hemings had her older brother and possibly a whole community of former slaves and/or mixed race servants to consult with.
One possibility that Gordon-Reed does not touch (Afraid, Gordon-Reed?) is that Hemings (and the other Hemingses) wanted white fathers for their children. Hemings herself had only one black grandparent and three white grandparents. Her mother and grandmother had both had children with white men (though they had no choice in the matter). The Hemings women were said to be beautiful, and the whiter they became, the more they were considered by whites to be attractive. It also made it a lot easier for them to receive better treatment from whites when enslaved and when freed.
It's not very PC to suggest that someone black would wish to become white. But Hemings was 3/4 white and her children with Jefferson were 7/8 white. Gordon-Reed herself points out that the one-drop rule (that anyone with one drop of "black blood" was considered black) was still 100 years in the future, and there was not solidarity among all people of African descent. Gordon-Reed does point out that there were many young, single, mixed-race free men in Paris whom Hemings could have married. But she didn't. She went home with Jefferson voluntarily. I think it's worth at least considering as a possibility that Hemings chose Jefferson because he was white, and that she thought her future children would have a safer future as mostly-white in Virginia with the promise of being freed at 21, than they would as somewhat less white in Paris and freed on the spot. That may not be cool by today's standards, but Hemings lived 200 years ago. In every other case, Gordon-Reed warns us not to judge 1790s actions by 2010 standards. But she seems to have blinders in this situation.
I am cooking tonight because Gerard has to work (boo). He did the grocery shopping though, and left me with ingredients and a recipe for Shoyu chicken (thighs, broth, soy sauce, brown sugar, garlic, ginger). Also some green beans to steam, as that's Emily's favorite vegetable and she's home for Thanksgiving. There's a 1/2 bottle of Green Truck organic chardonnay in the refrigerator with my name on it.